Are first-time buyers really forty years old now? This stat went completely viral over the past few months, but there are serious questions about accuracy. Let’s talk about this AND why it matters. I’m a bit late to addressing this, but this narrative won’t go away on social media, so I wanted to write something. I’ve been talking about this in recent presentations, and I find most people are shocked at the details.

UPCOMING SPEAKING GIGS:
1/21/26 Toll Brothers event (private)
1/22/26 DJ Lenth event (private)
2/11/26 Lodi Association of Realtors event
2/12/26 Answer Home Loans Event at PCAR
2/20/26 PCAR
2/26/26 NAPRM Luncheon
3/4/26 Nick Sadek Sotheby’s International Realty (private)
3/12/26 Made 4 More
3/18/26 Derek Sandoval Office (EXP)
3/19/26 Yolo YPN event
3/25/26 Coldwell Banker EDH
4/9/26 Realtist Association of Sacramento
4/14/26 Culbertson & Gray
10/2/26 PCAR

FIRST-TIME BUYERS ARE NOW 40 (ACCORDING TO NAR)
Stats from the National Association of Realtors look stunning. There has been a dramatic increase in the age of buyers. I guess it sounds true that first-time buyers could be forty since affordability has been such a problem, but check out the methodology and other stats sources below.

THE STATS ARE BASED ON A SURVEY WITH 6,000 RESPONSES
I’m a fan of surveys, but I’m not convinced just over 6,000 responses is cutting it here. Besides, who the heck fills out a 120-question survey these days? The only way I would maybe do it is if there was a $50 gift card attached to the survey (and boxes to check (not write-in)).


OTHER SOURCES SHOW DIFFERENT STATS
The biggest problem here is other sources don’t support the narrative NAR is putting out there. The Mortgage Bankers Association shared this chart last month, and check out five other sources that tell a different story than NAR stats. Look, I can’t really say who has the best methodology here, but NAR is a clear outlier, so I think we have to question the results. I’m choosing to not share the NAR stats in any presentation because I don’t feel confident in the data. In short, it looks like mostly everyone else shows first-time buyers are 32 and 33 years old.

WHY DOES THIS MATTER?
Stats can form narratives, so we have to get the stats right to be sure the narrative is right. And at the moment, we’re seeing an avalanche of attention on first-time buyers being forty for the first time, and that doesn’t look legit. The truth is affordability is awful right now, so I’m not sugarcoating, but let’s not share stats that look unsupported. Also, this stat feeds into lots of hopelessness and negativity relating to the housing market, and that’s not a good thing when younger people believe narratives based on seriously questionable data. My advice? Be realistic about the numbers, but don’t inflame negativity from inaccurate information.
Thanks for being here.
Questions: How old are the first-time buyers you’re seeing? What stands out to you in this post? I’d love to hear your take.
If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.





























Sorry emo kids, the color of the year isn’t black: I don’t think 











