Sacramento Appraisal Blog - Market trends and real estate appraisals for divorce, estate settlement, loans, property tax appeal, pre-listing and more. We cover Sacramento, Placer and Yolo County. We're professional, courteous and timely.

Explosive ADU growth & going viral online

July 30, 2026 By Ryan Lundquist 15 Comments

Accessory dwellings are all the rage, and I have some new stats to highlight explosive growth of ADU permits in the United States. And I went viral twice in recent weeks, and I want to share some thoughts on that now that I’m back from vacation.

UPCOMING SPEAKING GIGS:

8/6/26 PCAR Auburn
8/25/26 Elk Grove MLS Meeting 8:30am
9/1/26 ROG Talks
10/2/26 PCAR Rocklin
10/21/26 Coldwell Banker Sierra Oaks / EDH

AN EXPLOSION OF PERMITS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLINGS

Some new research from Cotality shows an explosion of ADU permits in the United States, so we have a real trend on our hands. However, I’d like to see how much California means here in the data since California had 72% of the ADU permits in the country in 2025 according to Cotality research.

TOP TEN STATES FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING PERMITS

Check out the top ten states for ADU permits. If you live in one of these states, are you starting to notice more accessory units? They are extremely common here in California, though not in every neighborhood. Being that they are expensive to build, I typically see them in locations above the median sales price. I’m definitely noticing more investors adding them to their properties to create ADU compounds also.

By the way, which state would lead in non-permitted ADUs?

IT’S POLICY. NOT JUST SUPPLY & DEMAND.

It’s nice to see California on top of a list these days since the state gets so much hate online, and leading is a reflection of progressive housing policy to ease the construction of ADUs. This is a powerful reminder that policy shapes the housing market. We often say housing is about supply and demand, but policy shapes supply and demand. All that said, it’s nice to see more accessory dwellings, but we need all types of units, and ADUs alone aren’t the solution to a housing shortage (even though they will help).

THE LINE IS GETTING BLURRY

The line between an ADU and a full-fledged second unit is getting blurry. For instance, last week someone asked me if a duplex with an ADU would be considered a triplex. That’s a good question. Let me ask you this. Is a single-family home with an ADU a duplex? I’m not trying to create confusion. All I’m saying is there are some big questions ahead, and expect a growth curve for the real estate community and lenders. I believe lenders have been behind the ball already with not allowing an ADU on a duplex, but thankfully this is changing (thanks Joe for the comment (I updated this sentence)).

GETTING EASIER TO FIND ACCESSORY UNITS ON MLS

MLS added an “ADU” field a couple years ago, and this is a great feature that many people don’t know about. Check out how many properties come up with potential ADUs when I’m looking at current listings, pendings, and sales in 2026. If you don’t see the “ADU” field while doing a map search, click “fields’, and then add the “ADU/2nd Unit” category so it will show up during every search from now on. You can also try the “Other Structures” field and then select “Guest House” to see if that works. I find when searching for ADUs, we have to try different ways of finding comps. In addition to these two fields, I would also click “search criteria” and “public remarks” to type in stuff like, “ADU,” “mother-in-law,” and “guest quarters.”

The positive here is we have so many types of structures to look through, but we also have to sift through other stuff like a pool house, studio without a bathroom, she shed in the backyard, garage conversion, and other stuff. Remember, an ADU needs a sleeping area, bathroom, and cooking area, so if it doesn’t have one of those elements, then maybe the ADU field shouldn’t be selected on MLS? All that said, real estate isn’t always black and white, so I think no matter what there is going to be some sifting needed. Whatever the case, this is absolutely a step in the right direction, and I appreciate Metrolist being on top of this.

I WENT VIRAL & I HAVE SOME THOUGHTS

I had two really viral posts on Twitter / X, and I have some thoughts to share. I guess this is off-topic, but it’s my blog, right?

MY TAHOE VACATION VIRAL POST

After a vacation in Tahoe last week, I posted the following photo on X (Twitter) because I thought it was striking for an Airbnb owner to warn about a Craigslist scam on the outside of the house. I think most people understood that I was simply a guy sharing this photo while legitimately renting the house, but I’ve had to clarify a good amount that I was not scammed. I added a few comments on the thread to add clarity too, of course. This post had 5.9 million impressions though. Holy Batman!!

**STUFF I LEARNED FROM THIS VIRAL EXPERIENCE:**

Sometimes the most random stuff can go viral, and that’s what’s so puzzling about social media. I’ll very likely never have a blog post or real estate content that has quick reach like this.
I don’t think going viral is the goal. In my mind, the goal of social media is to consistently get on base and build relationships with people. This post didn’t really add too many followers either.
Going viral takes a ton of time to respond, clarify, and have the same conversation over again a few hundred times probably. Part of the problem here is my original post probably needed more information, so that’s on me. As Mike Simonsen said to me, “There is nothing like a viral tweet to ruin a weekend.” Haha.
This led to an interview with KCRA Channel 3, and my photo is in the NY Post too (looks like a mug shot). I don’t know if this is good or bad, but I guess I think it’s kind of funny.

**THE SECOND VIRAL POST GOT REALLY UGLY**

Okay, let’s talk about the second viral post, which got surprisingly ugly for such a lighthearted topic. I was sharing about my garage man cave and what a difference it has made in my life for building friendships. Check out the thread here if you want. I’ve been very open in recent years about working too much and finding myself to be a statistic in the male loneliness epidemic. Anyway, I’ve been intentionally working to build friendships with people instead of just working, and this man cave has played a big part in helping me create some new patterns in life. I know I’m not alone here either because so many people have told me they can relate, and I’ve had some real estate friends ask me if their husbands can hang out with me (yes, they can).

Going viral can bring out some very nasty comments. When friends saw the comments on this thread and some quote tweets, they were collectively saying to me, “WTF happened here?” Honestly, I don’t know. I have to think the thread was linked to some online group because people came at me strong saying I wasn’t a real man, I was gay, this was an AI photo, and I was an out-of-touch Boomer (I’m Gen X). As soon as I posted that I was going to silence my notifications on the post, activity died down, and that tells me people are just looking for a reaction. Yikes though. The ugly part of going viral is this is what can happen in the comments.
The real world is full of cool people. Ultra-negative comments on social media don’t reflect what the real world is actually like. Don’t let the trolls shape your worldview.
I picked up 3,000+ followers from this post. I don’t know how many are real people versus bots, but I’d say despite the negativity, so many people are craving friendships and they resonated with my garage.
Be careful about micromanaging people’s words online. What we don’t want to do is look at a few sentences and assassinate a person’s character based on that. It’s sort of like when someone says they like apples, another person will then say, “Why do you hate oranges?” Sigh.
By the way, if you’re thinking constantly about whether you’re an alpha or a beta male, maybe it’s time to check yourself and start ignoring those labels. In my view, a man takes responsibility for his life and offers strength to others, and there isn’t just one narrow package of what a man looks like either.
My kids weren’t happy that I responded to the negative comments, and it honestly affected my mood quite a bit that weekend, but here’s the thing. I’m not okay with people talking to me like this, so I wanted to say something. Was it worth it? Probably not to be honest. I did like that a few people deleted their nasty comments though after I would say things like, “Tell me more. How is it gay to build friendships with people?” I just hate that people can be so mean and I have to sit there and take it. I’m not looking for any lectures here. I just wanted to share my thought process of why I said something rather than nothing. You do you.
Lastly, this reaffirmed my belief that we get to choose how we show up in person and online, and I believe we need to be the same in both places. Be cool to people. Mean people suck (’90s bumper sticker reference).

Anyway, I’ve had enough viral content over the past couple of weeks. I’m okay with modest reach ahead.

Thanks for being here.

Question: Would you ever build an ADU? What do you think of this trend? And what do you think about going viral?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

That place where serial killers and real estate meet

July 15, 2026 By Ryan Lundquist 10 Comments

What do serial killers and Sacramento real estate have in common? A new series is being developed by HBO about a serial killer in Sacramento who was responsible for seven bodies discovered in a backyard of a duplex on F Street in the 1980s. This has been the talk of town since news broke last week, so I wanted to mention the story and talk about the real estate involved.

UPCOMING SPEAKING GIGS:

8/6/26 PCAR Auburn
8/25/26 Elk Grove MLS Meeting 8:30am
9/1/26 ROG Talks
10/2/26 PCAR Rocklin
10/21/26 Coldwell Banker Sierra Oaks / EDH

HBO SERIES ANNOUNCED LAST WEEK

A GRISLY STORY WITH ’80s NOSTALGIA

True crime and the ’80s are both really popular, so I think the Dorothea Puente story can be compelling to tell. The short version is this woman ran a boarding house, and then killed the tenants so she could cash their social security checks. Oh, and the tenants were buried in the backyard of a duplex on F Street. She doesn’t look like a serial killer, does she? I guess it’s a reminder evil can come in all sorts of packages. The striking part to me is she had a very colorful history of crime long before the bodies were discovered, so I hope the series digs into her personal life and upbringing to help us understand how she became who she did.

FRONT PAGE NEWS PROGRESSION

Check out a sampling of the front page of The Sacramento Bee. I spent hours reading through old articles, and it was sobering to see the development where a leg bone was found on November 12th, four bodies two days later, and then seven bodies by November 15th. The Bee did an incredible job covering everything, and it’s a good reminder about the importance of newspapers. I scoured library archives to find these, and thanks to the SacBee for giving permission to post the images.

November 13, 1988

November 15, 1988

November 18, 1988

December 11, 1993

CROWDS GATHERED & SOCIAL MEDIA

When reading The Sac Bee archives, a piece on November 16, 1988 by Bill Lindelof talks about crowds gathering, a person dubbing the situation as “Nightmare on F Street,” and there was even a man who wanted to fill plastic cups with dirt from Puente’s backyard and sell them for $4.99 each. Yikes, did this happen? Now, imagine what it would be like today with social media if seven bodies were found.

WOULD THIS PROPERTY SELL FOR LESS?

Shifting gears, let’s talk about real estate and murder. This infamous duplex has actually sold four times over the past few decades. The first time it sold was 2002, and it closed at basically the bottom of the price market at the time. On one hand, it’s easy to conclude it was lower due to the stigma of murder, but it was also a fixer.

WAS IT STIGMA OR A FIXER? OR BOTH?

The Sacramento Bee noted on November 16, 2001 that the Puente property “is still stuck as a fixer-upper at best. It is scorched from a fire that all but destroyed the house next door, and the furniture has been removed, but otherwise it is unchanged from the days when Puente [lived there].” The piece went on to mention dry rot, holes in plaster, shoddy workmanship, and funky gold carpet from yesteryear. The listing agent was even quoted as saying, “Bring your contractor when you look at this place.” (11/16/2001 Section B1).

IT ALSO SOLD TOWARD THE TOP OF THE MARKET

In contrast, the Puente duplex sold toward the top of the price market twice in 2005 after it was updated, so it’s pretty clear the murders didn’t matter so much to those two buyers at least. Otherwise, it sold again in 2010 as a bank foreclosure, and it was a littler lower at the time, but not at the very bottom of the market either.

CLOSING THOUGHTS

I’m not saying the gruesome history at this property doesn’t matter to the market. I think we need more research than one graph and brief blog post to make that determination. All I’m saying is there’s a reason to explain why it sold at the bottom in 2002, and we shouldn’t hastily say it was due only to stigma when the condition was rough. In the past, my assumption was it was exclusively stigma, but more investigation through newspaper archives this past week really showed condition was a blatant factor (not saying stigma didn’t matter too). If anyone has connections to that real estate transaction, let’s talk. The listing from back then is not available on MLS, so I can’t check the details. I’d love to hear your perspective and how people at the time responded to the listing. Lastly, we need to concede that stigma can fade. In other words, a negative price reaction to heinous happenings can fade over time in the mind of the public. It’s true that some people would never buy a house like this, but do those people represent the market? That’s the valuation question.

—————- Stats for those interested —————-

SOME “KILLER” STATS FOR 12 COUNTIES

And now, I have some killer stats to share (sorry). I cover twelve counties of data, and here are the latest numbers. Check my socials daily for more.

RECAPPING THE MARKET

Prices are hit and miss as some areas are up slightly from last year and others are down. I would take price stats with a grain of salt in smaller counties as they can jump around all over the place from month to month. Supply is still subdued as new listings have been a little slower to come on the market lately while buyer demand has increased a bit. June was a strong month of closed sales volume in mostly all local counties, but some of the strength has to do with how weak last year was, so don’t flex too hard over a bigger June this year. In short, the market right now is a little more competitive than one year ago. Overall, closed sales volume for the year is up 5% in the region, and the largest growth is between $400K to $500K (a piece I did with ABC 10).

EXPECT PRICES TO BOUNCE AROUND

I expect price metrics will bounce around a bit more ahead, so don’t be too rigid from one month to the next (“We’re so back,” “Just kidding, we’re down,” “We’re up again”). Here’s median sales price change. We also want to look at other metrics such as Zillow’s index for Sacramento and the Freddie Mac price index for Sacramento. They’ve all been showing negative price change to be contracting over the past few quarters. What I mean is we’re no longer down 4%, but it’s been closer to 0% to 1%.

12 COUNTIES OF DATA (AND THE REGION)

Check out twelve counties. Please note I’m testing some smaller counties with 90 days of data instead of just 30 days since one month hasn’t been enough data to show a credible trend (90 days might not be enough either in some areas depending on what has sold).

I highlighted the size for El Dorado since smaller homes selling this year can affect the stats. Almost nobody shares stats like this, but it matters. We have to understand what we are comparing, right?

Larger homes sold in Nevada County lately, and that’s pushing some of the stats up. I used 90 days of data for Nevada County this time instead of 30 days, but stats are still all over the place. Smaller county vibes. I’m going nto continue testing this. Let me know what you think of 30 days or 90 days.

Anyway, I hope that was interesting. Thanks for being here.

Question: Will you watch the HBO documentary? Do you think there would be any effect on value for a duplex like this in today’s market? What did I miss? Anything else you would add?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

The housing market has been a little better, but not as good as Taylor & Travis

July 8, 2026 By Ryan Lundquist 4 Comments

Some really big things happened this week. Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce got married. The US Soccer team was eliminated from the World Cup. Oh, and the United States turned 250 years old. Look, there isn’t any housing headline that can begin to compete with this stuff, but there is some positive change happening. Let’s talk about an improvement in volume this year so far.

NOTE: This post is designed to digest slowly or skim quickly by topic

UPCOMING SPEAKING GIGS:

7/8/26 NorCal REI Meetup (RSVP here)
7/13/26 LPT Realty Zoom
8/6/26 PCAR Auburn
8/25/26 Elk Grove MLS Meeting 8:30am
9/1/26 ROG Talks
10/2/26 PCAR Rocklin
10/21/26 Coldwell Banker Sierra Oaks / EDH

MORE BUYERS IN 2026 SO FAR

We’ve started to see an improvement in closed sales volume. This isn’t a dramatic change, but so far, we’re up 4.9% from one year ago. Insert golf clap here for the positive news. For most of the year we’ve been talking about more pending contracts, and we’re starting to see those pendings close.

$10.6 BILLION IN PRICE VOLUME

So far, we’ve seen 17,000 sales and $10.6 billion in price volume this year. If you work in real estate, ask yourself where the transactions are happening, and focus on building relationships with these people. I realize this is very wide area, but in today’s market, the net gets cast a little further, right? Yes, I’ll take that listing in Nevada City. Heck yeah, let’s do Stockton.

IT’S HARD TO SEE WITH BOOTS ON THE GROUND

We have almost 5% more volume this year, but I think it’s hard to see the change for a few reasons. One, affordability is still really challenging, and I think most people see a lack of affordability more. Two, it’s a hard market for real estate professionals, and people in their individual book of business may not feel any change, especially if they’re not focused on $400,000 to $500,000 where we’ve seen the bulk of growth. Lastly, this isn’t that much change. If someone weighed 200 and lost 5% of their weight, only some people would notice ten pounds. Probably only good friends and family. All I’m saying is we haven’t had enough volume change for the masses to really notice yet.

It’s okay if you can’t see the change, but it has been happening, so how are you going to position your business? That’s the question. The truth is we choose our mindset no matter what is happening in life or the housing market. It’s also easy to say this and harder to apply in real life, but that doesn’t make it untrue.

THERE IS LEGITIMATE GROWTH HAPPENING THOUGH

It might be hard to see the change, but it’s happening. This is why we need to be careful with a boots on the ground view. Let’s also get an aerial view to really look at the stats. The truth is we’re still down significantly from the pre-2020 norm, but we’ve seen a bit of growth. Both things are true. One thing to keep in mind is June 2025 was particularly weak in light of economic uncertainty, so that’s giving a boost to the stats this year. Before June, we were up slightly less than 3% for the year. In layman’s terms, the market sucked bad last year, and we’re now outpacing it (probably not a massive flex here, but we’ll take the growth).

STRONGEST JUNE SINCE 2022

It was the strongest June of closed sales volume since 2022. I wouldn’t flex too hard over one month, but I wanted to at least share it.

HOMES IN GOOD CONDITION STAND OUT

I’m talking to an investor group tonight, and one of the points I’m going to make is how homes in good condition are a hot commodity in today’s market. Price it right and don’t ignore how sensitive buyers are to condition.

CONDOS HAVE A DIFFERENT STORY OF NO GROWTH

Condo volume has been flat, which is a good reminder the slightly better trend in the detached market isn’t going to show up for all property types. And while detached price change has not been intensifying downward, condo prices have persisted to decline more.

NEW CONSTRUCTION IS AHEAD TECHNICALLY

There have been almost 250 more new homes sale this year compared to last year, and new construction volume is basically on par with the pre-pandemic trend. However, there is more to the story.

It was a pretty weak June this year. While June 2026 still outperformed June 2025, this was historically low. All I’m saying is we want to watch new homes volume closely and not ignore some weakness in June in the midst of a pretty decent year overall so far. There are definitely some builders having a hard time because they’ve had to increase concessions and/or cut prices, which leads to less profit. Of course, for buyers, this is a good thing.

TOP 10 LOCATIONS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION

Where are buyers buying? Here’s a look at the top ten locations for new homes in the Sacramento region in June 2026.

MOST PRICE RANGES HAVE GROWN

Most price points in the region have seen growth this year. If you work in real estate, I encourage you to pay attention to locations and price ranges that are changing. This presents clues for what to talk about online and where to focus business.

A DISCONNECT FROM NAR HEADLINES

There is so much talk about first-time buyers being older than ever and the numbers falling to record lows, but the price range growing the most in the region is actually $400,000 to $500,000. It’s ironic because NAR is putting out headlines about boomers dominating the market and first-time buyers sagging, but the price range growing the most locally is one where first-time buyers tend to play. To be fair, I wouldn’t say every buyer in this range is a first-time buyer. It’s actually very challenging to gauge the number of first-time buyers in a market. I could tell you 19.2% of this price point used FHA financing, but many first-time buyers also use conventional, so we can’t just look to FHA.

NOTE: I’m not anti-NAR, but I’m not a fan of their generational survey that seems to keep producing viral headlines that are questionable. This survey says first-time buyers are 40 and first-time buyers are shrinking.

LOWER CANCELLATIONS COMPARED TO LAST YEAR

The number of listing cancellations is slightly lower than one year ago, and that’s not a shocker since the number of active listings has been lower today. We could say we’re not back to pre-2020 levels, and that’s true, but there were also many more listings in 2019.

THE 2007 COMPARISON GETS AWKWARD

So much of the housing narrative flippantly compares 2026 with 2007, but the stats are so different. The only stat that is similar is the number of sales being so low today like back then.

EMBRACE A SLOW BURN OF CHANGE

I suspect many people are hoping for quick change in the housing market, but we’ve been very stuck for years, and we are seeing a slow change. My advice? Don’t expect for a sharper change to the market without a sharper change to affordability. Keep your head down, build relationships, and rejoice in a little bit more volume today.

Anyway, I hope that was helpful. Thanks for being here.

Question: Are you noticing any volume change? What are you seeing happen with prices too? What did I miss? Anything else you would add?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

You can’t do a short sale if you’re tall

July 2, 2026 By Ryan Lundquist 8 Comments

We’re seeing more distress in the housing market. It hasn’t been a tidal wave of carnage like the online doom narrative often suggests, but there are changes happening, so let’s talk about underwater mortgages, short sales, and delinquencies. Today, I have some really interesting data that I’ve not shared before, and I hope you get something out of this post.

UPCOMING SPEAKING GIGS:

7/8/26 NorCal REI Meetup (RSVP here)
7/13/26 LPT Realty Zoom
8/6/26 PCAR Auburn
8/25/26 Elk Grove MLS Meeting 8:30am
9/1/26 ROG Talks
10/2/26 PCAR Rocklin
10/21/26 Coldwell Banker Sierra Oaks / EDH

NOTE: I’m not intending to be mean-spirited about short sales. I’m making a dad joke, which is a play on words. These stats represent people who are struggling. Let’s always remember that.

HOW MANY OWNERS ARE UNDERWATER ON THEIR MORTGAGE?

Some markets across the country have experienced sharper price declines, so they have 7-10%+ of homes being “underwater” so to speak (home is worth less than the mortgage amount). In most of California, the percentages are very modest around 1% or lower. Nationally, about 1.5% of mortgages are underwater according to ICE Mortgage Technology. Image from ResiClub (click here for an interactive map).

SACRAMENTO MORTGAGES UNDERWATER

Locally, about 0.8% of all mortgages have negative equity according to ICE Mortgage Technology. Here’s a look at how various years contribute to the overall percentage, and it’s not a surprise that homes sold after 2022 are contributing greatly here. Overall, this is very minor, but we are seeing some growth as it was 0.5% in April 2025. Click here to view 100 metros.

NOT A DISTRESSED MARKET, BUT WE’RE SEEING MORE DISTRESS

A good way to describe the trend is we don’t have a distressed market, but we’re seeing more distress. In other words, we’re no longer at pandemic lows, and we’re starting to see an uptick in delinquencies, foreclosures, and short sales. This is to be expected as we weren’t going to stay low forever. I find the housing doom side of things inflames this growth while the rosy real estate club ignores it. My advice? Take this in, but stay grounded. Stats from HUD.

FHA IS STRUGGLING MORE THAN OTHER LOAN TYPES

FHA is more delinquent than other types of loans, but it’s important to recognize FHA is about 15% of all loans in the United States. Locally, FHA loans have been about 10% of the regional market lately, though there are some neighborhoods in Sacramento County where FHA is over 30% of all transactions. Stats: MBA.

IT’S NOT A MARKET OF LOW-PRICED FORECLOSURES

In today’s market, there just aren’t that many distressed sales, so buyers need to adjust expectations. There is strong attention on homes that check all the boxes and low-priced fixers, so it can be surprising how competitive it feels for certain properties. This is where I think there is a disconnect between the actual market and the online narrative.

WHY ARE FHA BORROWERS DELINQUENT?

If you work in real estate, know what people are going through and be available to assist some who are carrying too much weight right now. The one category I removed was national emergency since it’s been incredibly minimal in recent time. I made this visual from HUD data.

WHERE HAVE FHA BUYERS PURCHASED?

I thought it would be interesting to look at the top locations for FHA purchases since 2022. This is based on reported financing in MLS. Roseville might surprise some since Placer County doesn’t have too much FHA, but keep in mind Roseville has many more sales than Citrus Heights and Rancho Cordova. So, if I did this as a percentage of FHA sales, Roseville definitely wouldn’t be in the second position. There were over 8,300 single family detached sales in Roseville since 2022, but Citrus Heights and Rancho Cordova only had about 3,000 each. Can you see why Roseville makes this list since it has significantly more sales? For perspective, FHA only represents 6.2% of sales since 2022 in Roseville, but it’s 17.9% of sales in Citrus Heights. Anyway, I hope you dig this list.

SHORT SALES ARE GROWING

Short sales are not much of a factor in the market today, but it’s something we want to keep on the radar because we are seeing some growth. I do expect to see more short sales ahead since prices have been so flat or down. The visual below represents January to June every year. I find people either minimize the growth or they zoom in to get sensational.

BE CAREFUL OF SENSATIONALISM

We could say there were 31% more short sales between 2025 and 2026, and while that’s technically true, we’re only talking about twelve sales. When dealing with small numbers, be careful of sensationalism. Or we could say we’ve seen over 1,500% growth since 2022 in short sales in the Sacramento region. Again, true, but very sensational. I’m not saying this to minimize any growth. All I’m saying is we want to look at both percentage and number change in real estate so we can understand the trend AND credibly convey what is happening. My advice? Be realistic about the stats, cultivate objectivity, and ignore people who inflame real estate stats with sensational percentages based on tiny numbers. These people are likely spinning a narrative, so be careful about getting sucked in.

HOW IS FHA SPREAD THROUGHOUT THE REGION?

Here’s a breakdown of FHA purchase volume in the Sacramento region since 2022. By far, Sacramento County has the bulk of volume at a whopping 72% of purchases.

Anyway, I hope that was helpful. Thanks for being here.

Question: What sort of conversations are you having right now with your sphere about economic carnage, short sales, etc…? What did I miss? Anything else you would add?

If you liked this post, subscribe by email (or RSS). Thanks for being here.

Share:

Share:

Share:

Share: